Jan-Lennard Struff vs Fabian Marozsan Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan

Wojtek Kolan

HEAD TO HEAD

J. Struff vs F. Marozsan

Jan-Lennard Struff
Jan-Lennard Struff

Flag GER GER

l
l
w
w
l
w
w
w
w
w
Fabian Marozsan
Fabian Marozsan

Flag HUN HUN

l
w
w
l
w
l
w
w
l
l

2

Win

4

Played

2

Win

35
Age
26
6'4" (193 cm)
Height
-
84
C. Rank
51
21
Best Rank
36
1
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$5.8M
Career Money
$2.5M
Right-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed

Head-to-head: Struff 2 - 2 Marozsan

They have played 13 sets in total, with Jan-Lennard Struff winning 7 and Fabian Marozsan winning 6. The last match between Fabian Marozsan and Jan-Lennard Struff was at the ABN AMRO Open - Rotterdam, 05-02-2025, Round: R1, Surface: I.hard, with Draw getting the victory 6-3 4-6 7-6(3).

PlayersHead To Head Match Wins
Struff2
Marozsan2
Last 4 H2H Matches:

(R1ABN AMRO Open - Rotterdam(02-05-25)

I.hard
HUN Flag
Fabian Marozsan
6
4
7
GER Flag
Jan-Lennard Struff
3
6
6

(R1Wimbledon - London(07-01-24)

Grass
GER Flag
Jan-Lennard Struff
6
6
6
6
HUN Flag
Fabian Marozsan
4
7
2
3

(QFSofia Open - Sofia(11-09-23)

I.hard
GER Flag
Jan-Lennard Struff
7
4
6
HUN Flag
Fabian Marozsan
6
6
4

J. Struff vs F. Marozsan H2H Profile

Stats
$5,821,180Career Prize Money$2,511,810
56.95% (602-455)Career Total W/L61.00% (280-179)
1Grass0
1Indoor2
14Titles8
2Total H2H Matches2
41.67% (15-21)YTD Win/Loss50.00% (26-26)

J. Struff vs F. Marozsan Match Preview:

  • Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Jan-Lennard Struff has won 46.52% of points on their second serve, while Fabian Marozsan has won 46.54%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
  • Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Jan-Lennard Struff, in recent form, has won 44.62% of their opponent's second serve points, while Fabian Marozsan has won 40.73%. The same stats for first serve returns are 22.86% and 23.59% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
  • Under pressure analysis: Jan-Lennard Struff has saved 57.44% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Fabian Marozsan has saved 56.31% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
  • Performance overview: Over the last year Jan-Lennard Struff has won 49.12% of matches played (W/L 28/29), with Fabian Marozsan winning 51.85% (W/L 28/26) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
  • Best surface: Jan-Lennard Struff has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 277/176), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 46% (W/L 31/37). Fabian Marozsan has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 185/106), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 36% (W/L 5/9).
  • Player level: In the last year, Jan-Lennard Struff has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 48.00% of matches (W/L 12/13), where as Fabian Marozsan has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 56.00% of matches (W/L 14/11). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
  • Direct H2H matches: They have played 4 times before with Jan-Lennard Struff winning 2 times and Fabian Marozsan being victorious 2 times. They have played 13 sets in total, with Jan-Lennard Struff winning 7 and Fabian Marozsan winning 6.
  • The last match between Jan-Lennard Struff and Fabian Marozsan was at the ABN AMRO Open - Rotterdam, 05-02-2025, Round: R1, Surface: I.hard, with Draw getting the victory 6-3 4-6 7-6(3).
  • Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:55:40.
  • Deciding set H2H prediction: Jan-Lennard Struff and Fabian Marozsan have played a deciding set 3 times, with Jan-Lennard Struff winning 1 times and Fabian Marozsan 2 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
  • Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 4 tiebreaks against each other with Jan-Lennard Struff winning 1, and Fabian Marozsan 3.
  • Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Jan-Lennard Struff has played against opponents with an average rank of 111.04 while Fabian Marozsan has played against players with an average rank of 84.67.
  • Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Jan-Lennard Struff has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Fabian Marozsan has won 56% in all matches played on tour.
  • Break point conversion: In recent form, Jan-Lennard Struff has converted 27.18% of breakpoint opportunities, and Fabian Marozsan has converted 23.66% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Jan-Lennard Struff vs Fabian Marozsan Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

J. Struff vs F. Marozsan H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

Stats
2H2H Matches Won2
7Sets Won6
70Games Won65
55Aces (Total)36
19Total Double Faults11
1:55:40Average Match Time1:55:40
59% (235/397)1st Serve %66% (282/430)
80% (188/235)1st Serve Win %73% (206/282)
54% (88/162)2nd Serve Win %48% (71/148)
40% (12/30)Break Pts Won %43% (9/21)
36% (153/430)Return Points Win %30% (121/397)
33% (1/3)Best‑of‑3 Win %67% (2/3)
100% (1/1)Best‑of‑5 Win %0% (0/1)
33% (1/3)Deciding Set Win %67% (2/3)
100% (2/2)1st Set Won, Won Match100% (2/2)
0% (0/2)1st Set Won, Lost Match0% (0/2)
0% (0/2)1st Set Lost, Won Match0% (0/2)

Recent Performance Stats

2nd Serve Win %: Struff 50%, Marozsan 53%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Struff 50%, Marozsan 50%.
Break Points Saved %: Struff 59%, Marozsan 65%.

J. Struff Recent Matches Played

OPPONENTRESULTSCOREH2H
I.hardLyon Challenger - 10-11-2025

F

GBRL. Broady
W
6-4 6-4

SF

FRAD. Added
W
1-6 7-6(5) 6-2

QF

CZEV. Kopriva
W
6-1 6-2

R2

ESTM. Lajal
W
6-4 6-2

R1

KAZB. Zhukayev
W
6-7(5) 7-6(1) 6-4

F. Marozsan Recent Matches Played

OPPONENTRESULTSCOREH2H
I.hardRolex Paris Masters - Paris - 27-10-2025

R1

FRAA. Rinderknech
L
7-6(5) 7-6(4)
I.hardAlmaty Open - Almaty - 13-10-2025

QF

RUSD. Medvedev
L
7-5 6-2

R2

USAB. Nakashima
W
7-6(5) 6-1

R1

ITAL. Nardi
W
7-6(3) 6-3
HardShanghai Rolex Masters - Shanghai - 29-09-2025

R2

USAT. Fritz
L
2-6 7-6(4) 7-6(1)
banner

J. Struff vs F. Marozsan Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

Stats
56.95% (602/455)YTD Win/Loss61.00% (280/179)
55.50% (1447/1160)Sets Win/Loss58.95% (642/447)
52.32% (13332/12152)Games Win/Loss53.66% (5544/4787)
47.71% (104/114)Hard Win/Loss62.00% (62/38)
61.15% (277/176)Clay Win/Loss63.57% (185/106)
59.75% (190/128)Indoor Hard W/L51.85% (28/26)
45.59% (31/37)Grass Win/Loss35.71% (5/9)
0.56Aces Per Game0.27
6953Aces Total1360
0.25Double Faults Per Game0.19
3133Total Double Faults939
1:20:13Average Match Time1:23:12
462.92Average Opponent Rank389.83
56% (38041/67386)1st Serve %65% (19070/29341)
75% (28663/38041)1st Serve Win %69% (13194/19070)
51% (14838/29336)2nd Serve Win %51% (5281/10271)
39% (2290/5931)Break Points Won % (Total)42% (1240/2950)
37% (25429/68467)Return Points Win %40% (11597/29172)
51.00% (51/49)Slam W/L48.00% (12/13)
54.01% (74/63)Masters W/L60.87% (28/18)
60.00% (21/14)Cups W/L28.57% (2/5)
47.79% (162/177)Main Tour W/L45.16% (28/34)
63.91% (193/109)Challenger W/L68.27% (71/33)
70.71% (99/41)Futures W/L64.95% (139/75)
58% (559/967)Best of 3 Sets Win %62% (269/432)
44% (37/84)Best of 5 Sets Win %39% (9/23)
50% (238/480)Tiebreaks Win % (Total)55% (85/154)
49% (183/370)Deciding Set Win %54% (75/139)
82% (598/493)1st Set Won, Won Match84% (286/239)
18% (598/105)1st Set Won, Lost Match16% (286/47)
24% (459/108)1st Set Lost, Won Match24% (173/41)

Other Tennis Predictions Today

12:00 PM 19/11/25
Prediction
GERR. Molleker
ITAP. O. Fellin
W1
1.52
W2
2.33
12:00 PM 19/11/25
Prediction
KAZB. Zhukayev
SRBM. Topo
W1
1.84
W2
1.84
12:00 PM 19/11/25
Prediction
ESTM. Lajal7
RUSA. VatutinLL
W1
1.33
W2
2.98
12:00 PM 19/11/25
Prediction
ITAS. NapolitanoPR
FINO. Virtanen3
W1
3.84
W2
1.21
12:00 PM 19/11/25
Prediction
ESTD. Glinka
GERT. Gentzsch
W1
1.58
W2
2.2